Fishing is synonymous with picture taking, or vice versa.
After a trip everyone seems to ask, “lets see the pictures,” which
may come off as either a truly pleasant or slightly skeptical
inquiry, depending on the level and/or amount of bullshit you just
spewed.
Maybe a hundred years ago, when fish bonking and
pile stacking was the rule, pictures weren’t as important as they
are today. But in the end, whether past or present, no one
seems to believe a damn thing a fisherman says unless there is some
type of proof, be it frozen in a bag, guts in a can, or ink on a
piece of paper.
Truth be told, I haven’t met a fisherman who doesn’t have at least
some sort of modest fascination with taking pictures, which is not a
complete shock. Not even a slight shock, really. Who
would believe the crazy looking bum who lives in the house with the
runaway lawn, and who’s gone for weeks at a time, unless there was
some reasonable proof in front of them about what he just said?
He also may or may not have wild animals in the backyard for fly
tying purposes. Being the humane creature a fisherman is,
he’ll keep the animals alive and simply pick off one or two features
as the need arises.
It
is strange to me how fish
always seems to shrink in a picture. A camera is said
to add ten pounds, so I guess fish must exist in some kind of
alternate universe from the
rest of reality, because in the domain of
fishermen, the main photographic-subject appears to
lose a bit of its stature when it gets its picture taken –by my
estimation, generally around ten percent of the reported size.
If someone claims to have landed a twenty-inch trout and you doubt
that that is the truth once you see the picture, it was probably
more like eighteen inches. Maybe seventeen, or even sixteen.
It really depends on how long you’ve known the guy, and how glazed
over his eyes get when he starts talking.
Generally speaking, the more shit one’s filled with, the more
obvious it is just by looking at them. And no, they typically
don’t have the give away smell.
A fisherman never tells you that the fish actually
looks a little bigger in the picture than it did in real life, and
it is really just the fisherman’s pose and a bit of distortion from
the wide-angle lens that make it look the same size as your leg.
People always try to say things like, “Oh, my hands make it look
small,” or “it was bigger than it looks.” How they manage to
convince themselves that the laws of physics and plain old common
sense don’t apply to them or their fish is simply bizarre.
What may be even more bizarre is the amount of fishermen who fall
into this trap, and worse yet, the ones who believe it with so much
conviction that they start doing it for themselves.
I’m
certainly not guilt free of this from my past days, and just to play
it on the safe side I try not to put a definite label regarding size
on the fish I catch nowadays. I’ll generally say things like,
“it was a good one,” or maybe, “one of the biggest I’ve got all
year,” and just as often as not, simply “nice fish.” The
people I fish with often will know what I mean well enough, and if I
just run into you on a stream somewhere, I don’t really give half a
damn how big you end up thinking that fish was or could have been,
so I’ll just let the listener conjure up just how big the fish was.
Again, how big his shit-eating grin gets is a good sign of his
imagination, and possibly more importantly, all around helpless
attitude.
Don’t feel the need to tell him off, though. Those sad souls
who have to count everything often need all the help they can get,
and fishermen are as adept as anyone to give advice. If you’re
a guide, or have been a guide, you’re more qualified than most to
help others, and the only reason people you know who happen to have
issues go to psychiatrists instead of fly-fishermen is so that they
can get a prescription. Mind you, the last thing you need is
to know that you’re going on a weeklong trip with a really messed up
guy, who may or may not crack completely while the two of you are
away and alone. Best let him get the drugs.
There are various types of fishing pictures. The most famous,
and traditional, is of course the Hero Shot. These are
typically the most exaggerated of pictures at least if you consider
a normal pose and actual emotion. They are generally
characterized by some doofus holding a fish, more often than not
shoving it right into the camera lens, and as often as not, he’s
trying not to smile, and looks pretty goofy most of the time.
I don’t know what some people have against smiling.
Personally, when I get a nice fish I’m usually just trying my best
to contain myself, not mess my pants, and to make the picture at
least respectable enough to put in a slideshow or hang on the living
room wall.
The
Hero Shot is typically off-centre, slightly out of focus, and taken
with no sense of proper proportioning. Often enough they have
a kitchen sink or backyard fence as a backdrop. At the very
least, remember to take the smoke out of your mouth.
Next in line is the nature shot. This type of shot is done by
the nature loving, peaceful, easy going type of guy who didn’t get a
degree in visual poetry, and who sometimes tries to present some
sort of off-centre connotation with nature as a backdrop.
Usually the whole picture is slightly exaggerated, at least when
looked at in a normal context. Extravagant poses, fish in the
flower patch, or some other strange demeanor typifies this type of
shot. As long
as we’re keeping score, these are also the ones that
editors of the glossy fly-fishing magazines might buy from you –just
don’t overdo it.
Lastly is my favorite. The ‘Take what you can get’ shot, which
sometimes can turn out quite brilliantly, but usually nothing except
the true moment is captured. I say “true moment” because we
all know just how rarely big fish are landed gracefully, let alone
maintaining a calm scramble after the fish is in the net.
Generally what we run into is a frantic escapade that defies the
odds, at least it seems that way once you finish giggling, finish
your beer, and have time to think, What the hell just happened?
Then you remember that pretty much everything that happened actually
went wrong –at least according to the general “plan,” but somehow
the fish still came to net and you got some sort of proof, although
how appealing the proof is to look at is in part a conversation of
scrutiny, and mostly a matter of opinion and self esteem. These are
the pictures that have your buddy holding up a fish, but he’s
soaking wet from falling in the creek after trying to unwrap his
line from the unfortunately placed log. Without a doubt, the
rest of the roll of film will be your friend getting out of his
waders and pouring the water out, with the angle of pictures getting
lower and lower, tilting at a greater angle with each successive
shot because you’re busy falling over and laughing and trying not to
pee yourself. Only about half of these pictures will be usable
and in focus, because you’ll be laughing way to hard to do anything
more than get your camera out and push the shutter, but those are
the good moments worth remembering anyway. These pictures capture
the true chaos that is fly-fishing. They never seem to go as
gracefully as you’d like, but they don’t really turn out all that
bad, either.
I
guess I should take a minute to say: No I don’t really have an
objection to fishing pictures. Plainly and simply, I just
think that fishermen should use a little bit of the discretion we
are all born with to eliminate many of the things that can ruin an
otherwise
perfectly acceptable photo. Smile, take the
sunglasses off, especially when facing directly at the camera, get
in a comfortable, natural position so you don’t look like your
taking a squat and someone just happened upon you. Put the rod
nicely under your arm, properly unwrap the line from your fish and
remove excess clutter from the scene, hold the fish low to the water
for a natural appearance, and please, for the love of god, don’t
shove the fish as far as your arm can reach. It looks
unnatural and, well, just plain goofy and a little obvious –your not
really fooling anyone when your thumb looks as big as your head.
As
far as the photographer goes, use the rule of thirds and divide the
picture into just that –thirds. It can be horizontal,
vertical, diagonal, or a spiral if you manage to pull it off, but
this type of composition gives the picture an easy to look at, and
otherwise jolly feel. Also, think of using your fill flash
more than you do now. The flash really can bring out the
colours in the subject, not to mention get rid of the annoying
shadow on a guy’s face from his hat.
The
most awkward phenomenon of the fishing picture is the fact that you
may actually start fishing with people who put off some sort of
respectable self-image, at least respectable looking in the
portrait. Not that they have to be especially pretty or
anything, but after a week of fishing and camping they tend to be
able to walk down a sidewalk back in town and not have little old
ladies madly scrambling across the street to safety.
But you don’t want anyone who’s too good looking, either. Not that fishing with them all that bad, but when you’re on a stream with one of these guys you’ll eventually wind up thinking, Why can’t I look that good in a picture, or at least something to that affect, and it is at that point that you should probably take some simple precautions to avoid further degeneration of your manhood. Hiding his razor, breaking his sunglasses, or misplacing his hat, and pretty much anything else that could make him look like a pompous fool, like the rest of us, should do the trick. Then again, you may be better off by simply not shaving for a couple more weeks, and otherwise allow yourself to slip away, if for no other reason than to prove once and for all that you really don’t give a damn about much of anything.
Written by: Nick Sliwkanich